A Book on the Internet for Christians End to End Trust Means You Can Surf Your Values Cable TV Plans More Targeted Advertising Interview on Virtual Integrity at Assignment: Future Computer Virus Activity Changing - More Dangerous Than Ever Watch Out: The Avatars are Coming! Cyber Ethics: Intriguing Headlines Keep Rolling In Title: Offering a Virtual Lifestyle: Why Simplistic Net Answers Won’t Be Enough in the Long Run
To print this page properly - use Print icon located on the page.
Please note that JavaScript has to be enabled.
 

Blog: Faithfully Online

Internet Freedom Versus Online Piracy

30-Aug-09 08:09 | Daniel Lohrmann (administrator)

 I came across an interesting article regarding the ongoing battle between Internet freedom and controlling online piracy. The London Times article entitled: An uncreative soultion to online piracy offers a fair view of the issue - before siding with the freedom side. 

 I highlight this article for several reasons. I have received several letters and article comments which point out many legitimate fears associated with new government controls regarding online conduct. In the same way that the majority distrust government regarding health care issues and the active debate on health insurance reform, many Christians distrust government regarding their monitoring of Internet activity. This fear has recently been expressed with headlines such as Bill would give President emergency control of Internet. I fully understand and respect these fears.

 There is also quite a bit of work being done globally to stop government censorship of the Internet in countries like China. There are many valid reasons to fight for Internet freedoms, and we certainly can't legislate morality.

 And yet .... to the "Internet freedom" crowd, I ask this question: what role should government have online? (Almost) everyone wants to stop child predators online, curtail plagiarism, reduce spam and help users be safe online, but is the government's role simply to provide web training and not enforce laws? I suspect we will be debating this question for decades to come.

 I tried to articulate a middle ground during a recent interview with The High Calling.

  "Think of the Internet as our new digital superhighway system. We have many freedoms on our roads, but we also have many laws. There are numerous parallels between roads and the Internet, including the need for good training, ensuring safety, and accepted codes of conduct.
 
At work, you must remember that the network belongs to your business. Courts have upheld that there is generally no presumption of privacy on company networks, and you must abide by acceptable use policies, as long as policies are clear and equally enforced. So remember, there are no "personal" messages at work—according to the law.

I also agree that controls alone will never solve our problems. There are thousands of ways to get around filters and controls, and we cannot rely on technology (or governments) alone to solve online problems. Solutions must address people, heart issues, repeatable processes, and technology." 

 Finally, Christians may rightly fear too much government intervention or too many external controls, but we need to take personal responsibility for our actions. Are you a part of the problem or the solution? That is, do you steal by copying music illegally? Are you truthful online? Do you have a separate Internet identity that would harm your family or career if the details were made public?

I'd love to hear your thoughts on this topic of Internet freedoms.  It is easy to sign up and leave comments.

 

Comments

  • 05-Sep-09 21:47 | Andrew Sutton
    This is an interesting post to me. I understand what you mean about not being able to legislate morality. I've spent a lot of time thinking about that topic and my opinions probably match the audience of this blog, so I won't dwell on that.

    Regarding what role the government should play on line, I may have an over simplified answer, but it is, in short, the same role they play in day to day life, which is to say, they should be responsible for enforcement of illegal activity. You can then ask what illegal is, and quickly wind up in a "chicken or egg" discussion, and to that I would say again, rather simply, that if there are laws being enforced that we don't agree on, we should take appropriate action to either repeal the laws, or elect politicians who will more accurately represent us and make laws that we DO want to have enforce. I realize this is a little simplistic.

    But if the speed limit on a street in my neighborhood is 25 miles per hour, and I think it ought to be 35, I've no right to disregard the law. And if I'm downloading things that I ought not be downloading, I should expect to be held accountable for that as well. This has become a personal conviction of mine in the past several years, and I work diligently to use open source solutions whenever possible and purchase legitimate software when open source alternatives aren't available or aren't practical. What I've found after several years of this is that there are a small number of circumstances where there aren't open source alternatives to piracy. I even pay for the music I download in iTunes. (As an aside, to me, paying for music downloads has a practical application in that there is considerably less risk of malware and the like when you get your music from legitimate sources.)

    You've mentioned in a number of posts the people and processes must be the cornerstones of internet on line responsibility and I couldn't agree more. In that regard alone there is a lot of work to do, and I think that even involves electing officials who are not going to be at one extreme or the other, but will help us enact legislation that strikes that balance between internet freedom and government censorship.

    Blogs like this one are a great way to get that ball rolling. Thanks Dan.

    Grace and peace.
    Link  •  Reply
 

Virtual Integrity - Faithfully Navigating the Brave New Web | Daniel J. Lohrmann
Media contact: virtualintegrity@brazospress.com
Copyright © 2008 Baker Publishing Group  - All Rights Reserved